Case 01

Redesigned Nursing Workflows by Tailoring to Distinct User Groups

ChristianaCare

Redesigned Nursing Workflows by Tailoring to Distinct User Groups

ChristianaCare Nursing Quality Assessment Website Redesign

Overview

Improved an assessment platform workflow and information architecture by aligning to 3 user distinct user groups, achieving 88% task success.

My Role

UX Design Intern

Company

ChristianaCare

Timeline

June 2024- August 2024

Team

1 UX Designer

2 UX Analysts

1 UI Designer

3 Front-end Engineers

1 Clinician

Skills

Figma

Domain Expertise

Agile Methodologies

Usability Testing

Problem

Nursing Quality Monitor, a legacy assessment tool used by all ChristianaCare hospitals, needs an update to streamline the 48-hour reporting process that involves three users that have different responsibilities and priorities.

Solution
Data Collection Nurse Flow: Assessment-focused

Nurses can start a pending assessment that is dynamic and broken down into sections instead of the previous long-scroll form that doesn't adapt.

Wound Nurse Flow: Validation-focused

Wound nurses care about validations — they can filter assessments by statuses and time and start a pending one, instead of clicking on all assessment forms.

Data Analyst Flow: Report, Administration-focused

Data analysts get a birdseye view to assessments and validations so that they can send progress reminders to nurses.

Their main jobs are exporting reports and administrate the assessment event, and the two tabs separate the features for clarity.

Now, let's start with some context

ChristianaCare is a national healthcare organization, and its Health and Innovation team is responsible for developing innovative enterprise and commercial products facing both clinicians/non-clinicians and patients. As a UX Design Intern with a focus on human-centered design and Gen AI, I worked on two projects that optimize the experiences of healthcare professionals: NQM, and CritiTrac (see project).

The Nursing Quality Monitor (NQM) is the primary assessment tool used across all ChristianaCare hospitals to evaluate patient pressure injuries during monthly Process Improvement (PI) days. As part of the software upgrade, I served different roles throughout the sprints.

Goal

Modernize the outdated NQM design to improve usability, support all users' jobs while aligning with NDNQI requirements.

My Role

Lead UX designer and Development Team Research Member during 4 week sprints, helping set the foundation for the software update.

Product Development Process

The team engaged in a sprint-style development process. I served as a Researcher for the Dev Team responsible for assessment database-relevant research, and the Lead UX designer responsible for designing concept-based wireframes for all the screens.

Understanding the Problem

First of all, I learned about a problem surrounding the 3 key users: Data Analysts, Data Collection Nurse, Wound Nurse.

​When you expect a clear, one-way workflow, the reality is that there are a lot of factors involved that creates many mini sub-flows that drags the process longer:

In-field observation and surveying reveals another problem. We asked nurses and data analysts to describe their work and ask questions like:

  • "What action do you perform?"

  • "How do you call this tool?"

  • "Who calls it the same way?"

I summarized each role with a statement:

The users use different terminologies due to differences in duty, unit, and tools at hand.

What do these tell us?

These insights pointed to a core issue: while the three users are part of the same assessment workflow, they operate with different mental models, terminologies, and priorities. This fragmentation not only affects communication but also slows down decision-making.

To address this, we translated our research into design themes that respect each user’s role-specific workflow. The original design is a one-size-fits-all assessment tool, so I thought:

I began wireframing surround this idea by tailoring the homepage, metrics, and core actions for each user group with:

  1. Key Metric: Differentiate homepage interface by displaying key target metric that nurses and data analysts look for. Previously, they look for this information by referring to a combination of notes, EHR, and unit situation.

  2. Key Function: Highlight nurses and data analysts's key jobs to be done in action buttons and side menu tabs. Previously, they explore functions that are looking for amongst a list of all functions.

Data Collection Nurse

📊 Key metric: number of patients assessed
💼 Key function: Assessment form


Wound Nurse

📊 Key metric: number of wounds validated
💼 Key function: validating wounds sent from data collection nurses

Data Analyst

📊 Key metric: number of total patients assessed
💼 Key function: synthesizing all data and reporting externally

Usability Tests

We conducted usability tests accordingly with data collection nurses, wound nurses, and data analysts by assigning them tasks while navigating through the Figma wireframes.

After iteration, the updated wireframes receive a relatively high task completion rate with the following feedback:

💬 Data Collection Nurse: "The updated version of the assessment is life-changing. I can imagine myself being so productive in doing it, and training others."

💬 Wound Nurse: "I like how the design pays respect to us...it gives us a sense of control and say in the flow of work, like when I delegate between other nurses and the system admin."

💬 Data Analyst: "I like the clear lines between different data lookup and export formats. Looks like it will help me reduce some workload."

Results
✅ Task Completion Rate

88% of users (15 total) successfully completed the task in semi-structured usability test.

✅ Task Completion Rate

88% of users (15 total) successfully completed the task in semi-structured usability test.

✅ Task Completion Rate

88% of users (15 total) successfully completed the task in semi-structured usability test.

✅ Positive Usability Feedback

Design validated qualitatively.

✅ Positive Usability Feedback

Design validated qualitatively.

✅ Positive Usability Feedback

Design validated qualitatively.

✅ Completed Design Deliverables:

Delivered a full set of wireframes, including a summary dashboard and data analysis features, ready for development.

✅ Completed Design Deliverables:

Delivered a full set of wireframes, including a summary dashboard and data analysis features, ready for development.

✅ Completed Design Deliverables:

Delivered a full set of wireframes, including a summary dashboard and data analysis features, ready for development.

✅ Implementation Readiness

The design was finalized and ready for handoff to the development team.

✅ Implementation Readiness

The design was finalized and ready for handoff to the development team.

✅ Implementation Readiness

The design was finalized and ready for handoff to the development team.

✅ Launched with Modifications

The updated system was successfully launched in 2025, incorporating modifications based on feedback.

✅ Launched with Modifications

The updated system was successfully launched in 2025, incorporating modifications based on feedback.

✅ Launched with Modifications

The updated system was successfully launched in 2025, incorporating modifications based on feedback.

Challenges
Collaborating with Development Team Real-Time

I worked very closely with the software developers in building the basic assessment database, which required fast-paced iteration on wireframes that is goal-driven instead of perfection-driven, which I grew to adapt to as a Product Owner.

Balancing Between What User WANTS vs. NEEDS

Hearing what users would like to see and use made me overwhelmed at times — users want EVERYTHING on the page. Learning to take inspiration from the big picture, such as users mental model, their patterns of behaviors, and taking only bits of the wants helps me make designs that drive the needs of the experience.

Making Someone Key

Having three key stakeholder each holding their own professional opinion is difficult — and it all comes down to making the Wound Nurse perspective key since they are the middleman and expert of the assessment, and designing surrounding the idea.

Catherine Burch

Vice President

Your constant drive to seek feedback and improve is so helpful and inspiring, and it really resulted in great things. What you have contributed here is amazing.

Kelsey Kosinski

Senior UX Analyst

The proposal pitch was so insightful and relevant to our software…it went well beyond my expectation. Keep up the good work!

The proposal pitch was so insightful and relevant to our software…it went well beyond my expectation. Keep up the good work!

The proposal pitch was so insightful and relevant to our software…it went well beyond my expectation. Keep up the good work!

Philip Chan

Associate UX Analyst

Thank you for bringing a new perspective to the team, on product and on teamwork.

Thank you for bringing a new perspective to the team, on product and on teamwork.

Thank you for bringing a new perspective to the team, on product and on teamwork.

Select this text to see the highlight effect